This Guest paper was submitted for publication and is copyright to Mark A. Seely© 2016.
Published here February 2017

PART 1 | Editor's Note & Table of Contents | Chapter 2: Deconstructing the Paradigm
What Has Changed? | Commodity Stereotyping
Observations on: Exhibits A through G | Exhibits H through P 
Alignment with the DBM Taxonomy: Levels 1 and 2 | Levels 3 to 5
Chapter 3: Reconstructing the Paradigm | The DBM Establishes the Complexity
Matching and Mismatching | PART 3

The DBM Establishes the Complexity

The Dynamic Baseline model establishes the complexity of an initiative based on the levels the initiative disturbs, or renders dynamic, within the hierarchy and establishes a reference or control point for management based on the stable reference above the dynamic baselines. This concept can be thought of in terms of expanding horizons of management purview - the higher the dynamics, the greater the horizon of management concern and, the greater the complexity.

For Level 1 — Process Management — the product configuration is impacted by the initiative whereas the "Rules" of the process provide a stable reference. This is, thus, a rules-based archetype. All baselines above it are also stable and therefore are not of consequence to Level 1 Management.

Level 2 — Project Management — interferes with the rules baseline — one need throw out the rules to enable a custom initiative. The stable reference is "Methods" or the methodology that one follows in pursuit of a custom construction. It is a methods-based archetype. The rules within will dynamically change to accommodate the unique features of a custom construction. All baselines above it are also stable and therefore are not of consequence to Level 2 Management.

Level 3 — Program Management — interferes with the Methods baseline. The Methods baseline is dynamic as is the rules baseline. This is a construct based on a stable "Objectives" reference. It is an objectives-based archetype. The two baselines above it are also stable and therefore are not of consequence to Level 3 Management.

Level 4 — Program Governance — interferes with the objectives baseline. The objectives, Methods and Rules baselines below are dynamically changing. This is a construct based on a stable "Principles" reference. It is a Principles-based archetype. The baseline above is also stable and therefore not of consequence to Level 4 governance.

Level 5 — Public Governance — interferes with the Principles reference. All baselines below Values are dynamically changing. This is a Values-based archetype.

Moving up through the five levels, the dynamics expand, uncertainty expands, and complexity increases exponentially.

Chapter 3: Reconstructing the Paradigm  Chapter 3: Reconstructing the Paradigm

Home | Issacons | PM Glossary | Papers & Books | Max's Musings
Guest Articles | Contact Info | Search My Site | Site Map | Top of Page